RESULTS


Most graduates are satisfied with their studies (76%).

More than three-fifths of graduates (62%) would not change their choice and would study the same program at the same faculty. 83% would choose the university again.

The studies were linked to current knowledge in the field (70% agreement), were demanding (70%), and would not have been possible without regular self-study (70%). A high number of quality teachers were involved in the education (74%).

In terms of facilities and services, graduates rated well the availability of study literature and the quality of library services (81%), as well as student department services (75%), positively.

Two-thirds of Charles University graduates were employed at the time of the survey. About 14% were still studying, and 9% were self-employed. Only about 1% were unemployed.

Approximately four-fifths of graduates (82%) consider the field they studied or a related one to be most suitable for their work.

Graduates are less likely to agree that their studies sufficiently prepared them for working in an international environment (37%) and that they offered enough practical teaching (33%).

In terms of services and facilities, dining services (46% satisfaction) and accommodation services provided by dormitories (41%) were rated lower.

Just over half (52%) of graduates say their studies prepared them well for practice.

Over 57% of graduates would improve their studies in relation to professional practice, particularly by focusing on the connection between studies and practice (90%), working with modern methods and technologies (43%), and intensive foreign language teaching (40%).

Nearly one in five graduates works outside their studied field. The most common reasons for this are low salaries in the field (41%), difficulty finding work in the field (36%), and the job not matching the graduate's original expectations (26%).


Survey results vary significantly across faculties, study programs, as well as their types and forms of study. Therefore, the results are analyzed internally with tools that allow for fine filtering across different specifics. All employees of Charles University have access to this tool. The dataset is then shared with individual faculties, allowing them to evaluate even the information provided by students in open responses, and corrective measures can be taken if necessary.


A public presentation of the results is available on the website, which can be found here (available only in Czech).


Last change: April 4, 2025 11:28 
print