|
Most students (67%) are satisfied with the quality of their study program. | ||
|
66% of students would choose the same study program at the same faculty again. | ||
|
Only 1.4% of students would not choose to study at university again. | ||
|
71% of respondents are satisfied with the content of mandatory courses, and a similar proportion (74%) are satisfied with the offer of compulsory elective courses. | ||
|
There is a high level of satisfaction among students with the approach and supervision of their thesis advisor (85%) and the development of critical thinking (76%). | ||
|
Students are satisfied with the availability of electronic information resources (77% satisfied), the opening hours and location of libraries and study rooms (74%), and the equipment of practical teaching rooms (71%). | ||
|
Only a slight majority of students (62%) expect to complete their studies within the standard period of study. | ||
|
37% of respondents have encountered a situation where they wanted to enroll in a compulsory elective course, but the course capacity was insufficient. | ||
|
Only 55% of students believe that the study program adequately prepares them for their future careers. | ||
|
Just 52% of students agree that it is possible to balance personal life and studies without difficulty. | ||
|
Only 42% of students are satisfied with the availability of spaces for informal meetings on campus. | ||
|
Only 12% of students have participated in a study abroad program. The most common reasons for not participating include concerns about not completing their studies within the standard period of study (54%), financial reasons (33%), and family reasons (30%). |
Survey results vary significantly across faculties, study programs, as well as their types and forms of study. Therefore, the results are analyzed internally with tools that allow for fine filtering across different specifics. All employees of Charles University have access to this tool. The dataset is then shared with individual faculties, allowing them to evaluate even the information provided by students in open responses, and corrective measures can be taken if necessary.
A public presentation of the results is available on the website, which can be found here (available only in Czech).